State v. Davis
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN (Robert M.), Judge.
Defendant contends that the trial court erred when it failed to grant defendant’s motions to dismiss counts one, two, three, and four of each indictment at the conclusion of all the evidence.
Upon defendant’s motion for dismissal, the question for the court is whether there is substantial evidence (1) of each essential element of the offense charged and (2) of defendant being the perpetrator of such offense. State v. Powell, 299 N.C. 95, 261 S.E. 2d 114 (1980).
Count one of each indictment charges defendant with the crime of obtaining property by false pretenses in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. CroninSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. SummrellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. . HatchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
- State v. . AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Combs v. City Electric Supply Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- State v. WalstonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- State v. AlmondCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- State v. SpeckmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
- Opinion No. (2004), California Attorney General Reports2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.