Breidert v. Krueger
Indiana Supreme Court
Erom the Noble Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.
This action oi’iginated before a justice of the peace. It is apparent from the averments in the body of the complaint, that the amount actually in controversy is fifty dollars, and no more. The measure of recovery is fixed by the written instrument upon which the complaint is founded, and it can be readily seen from an inspection of the instrument and a consideration of the facts stated, that in no event could the recovery have exceeded the sum named. In the conclusion of the complaint, appellant demands judgment for seventy-five dollars.
The appellee in a very elaborate brief insists, that,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Fowler v. Charles BishopSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1864
- Inhabitants of Congressional Township No. 11 v. WeirIndiana Supreme Court · 1857
- Murphy v. EvansIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
- Guard v. CircleIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
- Epperly v. LittleIndiana Supreme Court · 1855
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ex parte SweeneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
- Everett Piano Co. v. BashIndiana Court of Appeals · 1903
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. CoyleIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Winship v. BlockIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Wysor v. JohnsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.