Legal Opinion

Craine v. Department of Labor & Industries

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 9, 1943No. 28996PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlake, J.

J. — Plaintiff sustained injuries while working for C. H. Turner, who was building a dwelling house for himself at 3512 McKinley avenue, Tacoma. Turner was not a building contractor nor engaged in construction work as a business. Building construction was in no way connected with his regular occupation and business.

Plaintiff filed a claim for compensation with the department of labor and industries. The supervisor rejected the claim, and, upon plaintiff’s appeal to the joint board, the latter sustained the action of the supervisor. From the decision of the joint board, plaintiff appealed to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Carsten v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Norman v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Dalmasso v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Haller v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Jannak v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1935

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Latimer v. Western MacHinery ExchangeWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Nyland v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Lynskey v. LindIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Pitts v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Bennett v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API