Legal Opinion

Nyland v. Department of Labor & Industries

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1952No. 32126PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDonworth, J.

This appeal presents the sole question whether a person engaged in the business of fishing (which is not covered by the workmen’s compensation act) who hires others to labor in the extrahazardous employment of building a boat for use in his fishing business, is an employer within the meaning of the act.

Since 1912 or 1913, William E. Melzer has been a commercial fisherman. In 1944 and 1945, with the aid of carpenters, shipwrights, and other workmen employed by him, he built an eighty-foot seine boat, the Windward, for use in his fishing operations. Plaintiff was one of the workmen employed in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wendt v. Industrial Insurance CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Carsten v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Berry v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Dalmasso v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  5. State v. Business Property Security Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. CoeWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Spokane Methodist Homes, Inc. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Bridges v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Balmer v. DilleyWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Balmer v. DilleyWashington Supreme Court · 1972

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API