Nyland v. Department of Labor & Industries
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDonworth, J.
This appeal presents the sole question whether a person engaged in the business of fishing (which is not covered by the workmen’s compensation act) who hires others to labor in the extrahazardous employment of building a boat for use in his fishing business, is an employer within the meaning of the act.
Since 1912 or 1913, William E. Melzer has been a commercial fisherman. In 1944 and 1945, with the aid of carpenters, shipwrights, and other workmen employed by him, he built an eighty-foot seine boat, the Windward, for use in his fishing operations. Plaintiff was one of the workmen employed in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wendt v. Industrial Insurance CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Carsten v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1933
- Berry v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- Dalmasso v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1935
- State v. Business Property Security Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. CoeWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- Spokane Methodist Homes, Inc. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1972
- Bridges v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1955
- Balmer v. DilleyWashington Supreme Court · 1972
- Balmer v. DilleyWashington Supreme Court · 1972
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.