Legal Opinion
Hewitt v. Maass
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 13, 1964PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJack Stanislaw, J.
Plaintiffs’ complaint, spanning 63 pages with 316 numbered allegations and alleging 8 causes of action generally in the nature of a corporate shareholder’s derivative suit, is the object of one defendant’s motion to dismiss. All the defendants are past and present officers and directors of the corporation. This motion is founded on the following deficiencies of the complaint as proposed by the movant: (1) insufficiently descriptive of causes of action against the movant, (2) untimely and barred by statutory limitation of time, (3) indefinite and obscure, and (4) irrelevant, repetitious,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Condon v. Associated Hospital ServiceNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
- Abrams v. AllenNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
- Mencher v. RichardsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
- Solomon v. LaGuardiaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
- Tankoos v. Conford Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sutton v. DukeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- Chiapperini v. Gander Mountain Co.New York Supreme Court · 2014
- Kaufman v. HoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Nussenblatt v. NussenblattNew York Supreme Court · 1970
- Cassissi v. YeeNew York Supreme Court · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.