Legal Opinion

Drydock Knitting Mills, Inc. v. Queens Machine Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 11, 1938PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Action to recover damages for breach of a written contract by which defendant agreed to build three machines for plaintiff, who agreed to purchase them on certain terms. Defendant appeals from an order denying its motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, or, in the alternative, to direct that the complaint be made more definite and certain, and to strike therefrom certain allegations as irrelevant and redundant. Resettled order modified by striking out the ordering paragraph and by inserting in its place a paragraph…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brick v. Cohn-Hall-Marx Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1937
  2. Tankoos v. Conford Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
  3. Bloom v. GelbAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Keene Corp. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1984
  2. Rosenbluth v. SackadorfNew York Supreme Court · 1947
  3. England Strohl/Denigris, Inc. v. WeinerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1982
  4. Regnell v. PageAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  5. Metz v. Forest Hills Homes, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1949

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API