Legal Opinion
Doe v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 20, 2005No. CIV.A. 03-1789(GK/JMF)PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FACCIOLA, United States Magistrate Judge.
This case was referred to me by Judge Kessler to resolve all discovery disputes. Currently pending and ready for resolution are two discovery motions. For the reasons stated herein, The District of Columbia’s Motion to Compel Discovery (“Def.’s Mot.”) [# 187] is granted in part and denied in part, and District of Columbia’s Supplement to Its Motion to Compel (“Def.’s Supp.”) [# 214] is denied.
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Plaintiff John Doe, a minor child, alleges, through his next friend Bob Doe, that he was physically and sexually abused…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- City of Oklahoma v. TuttleSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Charles Carter v. District of Columbia, Maurice Turner, Chief, Metropolitan Police Department Charles Carter v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
- Food Lion, Incorporated v. United Food and Commercial Workers International Union, Afl-Cio-Clc, United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio-ClcCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- Turner v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Robert P. Smith v. James R. Schlesinger, Secretary of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Jewish War Veterans of the United States of America, Inc. v. GatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- United States v. O'KeefeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Jose Hernandez v. Results Staffing, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
- Kemp v. HarrisDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2009
- Sparton Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.