Legal Opinion

Kemp v. Harris

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided September 22, 2009No. WDQ-08-0793PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

PAUL W. GRIMM, United States Magistrate Judge.

This Memorandum and Order addresses Defendant’s Motion for Sanctions or, Alternatively, to Compel Responses to Harris’ Written Discovery, Paper No. 62; Plaintiffs’ Response to Defendant Harris’ Motion for Sanctions or, Alternatively, to Compel Responses to Harris’ Written Discovery, Paper No. 70; and Officer Harris’ Reply to Plaintiff’s Response to Motion for Sanctions or, Alternatively, to Compel Responses to Harris’ Written Discovery, Paper No. 71.1 I find that a hearing is unnecessary in this case. See Local Rule 105.6. The…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Goodman v. Praxair Services, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2009
  3. Mancia v. Mayflower Textile Servs. Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 2008
  4. Vollert v. Summa Corp.District Court, D. Hawaii · 1975
  5. Jayne H. Lee, Inc. v. Flagstaff Industries Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Baltimore Line Handling Co. v. BrophyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2011
  2. Lynn v. Monarch Recovery Mgmt., Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2012
  3. Madison v. Harford County, MDDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2010
  4. Richardson v. Sexual Assault/Spouse Abuse Research Center, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2010
  5. Anderson v. Discovery Communications, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2011

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API