Arthur v. Coyne
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court,, Tulsa County: John H. Pitchford, Judge. Suit by Partrick E. Coyne against Andrew Arthur. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
BREWER, C.
This is a suit to declare a resulting trust, and for damages. It was filed in the United States Court for the Western District of Indian Territory on March 24, 1905. On May 26, 1909, a jury being waived, it was tried by the district court of Tulsa county, and the judgment was ren dered in favor of plaintiff, in which it was adjudged that plaintiff was the equitable owner of a one-half interest in lot 4 of block 70 of the city of Tulsa, and that defendant was holding the legal title to such interest as trustee for plaintiff. The court also awarded plaintiff one-half of the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Johnson v. TowsleySupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Shepley v. CowanSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Moore v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Marquez v. FrisbieSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Beard v. FederySupreme Court of the United States · 1866
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Ludey v. Pure Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Frandson v. CaseyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1955
- Ellis v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
- Burt v. SteiglederSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Delk v. Markel American Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.