Legal Opinion

J. F. Wilkerson Contracting Co. v. Rowland

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 16, 1976No. 7610SC53PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Judge.

The judgment on the. pleadings disposed of fewer than all the claims, but this appeal is not subject to dismissal under G.S. 1A-1, Rule 54(b) since the trial court in the judgment found “no just reason for delay.”

In its judgment on the pleadings the trial court made findings of fact and conclusions of law. The court is not required to find facts in a judgment on the pleadings since the facts determining disposition are those alleged in the pleadings; and the court cannot select some of the alleged facts as a basis for granting the motion on the pleadings if other allegations,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ragsdale v. KennedySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. AMERICAN BANK AND TRUST COMPANY v. ElzeyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  3. Marks v. . McLeodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. United Virginia Bank v. Air-Lift Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  2. High v. ParksCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  3. G & S Business Services, Inc. v. Fast Fare, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  4. Loyd v. GriffinNorth Carolina Business Court · 2021
  5. Contracting Co. v. RowlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API