Legal Opinion

In Re Hickson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 25, 2003No. 23 EAP 2001 and 24 EAP 2001PublishedCited by 108 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Chief Justice CAPPY.

At issue in these appeals is who has standing to seek judicial review of a district attorney’s disapproval of his private criminal complaint. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the orders of the Superior Court.

On September 26, 1997, state parole agents Isaac Hickson (“Hickson”) and Robert Martinez (“Martinez”) shot and killed Kenneth Griffin (“Griffin”) while attempting to arrest him. Griffin was wanted for absconding from a halfway house and was a suspect in an armed robbery that occurred earlier that month.

The Philadelphia District Attorney (“District…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Asarco Inc. v. KadishSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Phillips v. A-Best Products Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Sprague v. CaseySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Commonwealth v. WalkerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. State v. AtkinsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by108 opinions

  1. City of Philadelphia v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Pittsburgh Palisades Park, LLC v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Mikhail v. KahnDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. Weaver v. Lancaster Newspapers, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Governor's Office v. Office of Open Records, Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014

103 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API