Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Padilla

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 28, 2005PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

MONTEMURO, J.:

¶ 1 This is an appeal from the judgment of sentence of six months’ reporting probation imposed following Appellant’s bench conviction of indirect criminal contempt. Appellant was found to have violated a temporary order under the Protection from Abuse Act (PFA), 23 Pa.C.S.A. § 6101, et seq., directing him to have no contact with the victim, a woman whom he had been dating for four months.

¶ 2 In the late afternoon of Friday, November 12, 2004, the victim received an emergency PFA directive ordering Appellant to have no contact with her for 18 months. Because of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. StallworthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. Commonwealth v. BakerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Commonwealth v. AshtonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Kelly v. MuellerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BrumbaughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Commonwealth v. MooreSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Commonwealth v. MoodySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  4. Commonwealth v. StatonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  5. Com. v. Adamski, A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API