Legal Opinion

John Holfester v. The Long Island Railroad Company

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided May 10, 1966No. 298, Docket 30148PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, Circuit Judge:

The principal and determinative issue in this case is whether or not the facts bring it within the Boiler Inspection Act, 45 U.S.C. § 23. The jury could have found the facts to be as follows: About 7:25 p. m. in the evening of December 22, 1963, a train arrived at Jamaica station. One of its cars, an electric, self-propelled mail and baggage car, designated as #4207, was detached and placed on Track 3E of the train assembly yard for inspection. It was scheduled to leave again between 10:00 and 10:30 that night. After the plaintiff-appellee, Hol-fester, who was a car…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Urie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Lavender v. KurnSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Johnson v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
  4. Lilly v. Grand Trunk Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. Delk v. St. Louis & San Francisco RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1911

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Willard Green v. River Terminal Railway Co., Third Party Jerald E. Dawson, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  2. Northern Indiana Public Service Co. v. OtisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railroad Company v. Dallas D. Speth and Olin Mathieson Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
  4. Carolyn Crockett v. The Long Island RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  5. Herold v. Burlington Northern, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API