Legal Opinion
Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Ace American Reinsurance Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 25, 2006No. SC 17329PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PALMER, J.
The sole issue raised by this certified appeal is whether an order denying a motion for pre-pleading security pursuant to General Statutes § 38a-27 (a) 1 is an appealable final judgment. The trial court denied the motion of the plaintiffs, Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company and thirteen of its affiliates, 2 2 to compel the defendants, various unauthorized reinsurance companies 3 doing business in the state of Connecticut, 4 to post prepleading security in accordance with § 38a-27 (a). The plaintiffs appealed from the order of the trial court to the Appellate Court, which…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Richardson-Merrell Inc. v. Koller Ex Rel. KollerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- State v. CurcioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Miller v. EganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Shay v. RossiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- BROWN AND BROWN, INC. v. BlumenthalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Palmer v. Friendly Ice Cream Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- BNY Western Trust v. RomanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- State v. FieldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Abreu v. LeoneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.