Legal Opinion
Bank of United States v. National City Bank
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 23, 1924PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBijur, J.
This is a motion by plaintiff for judgment under rule 113. In my opinion nothing but a question of law is involved, as upon the affidavits I find no issue of fact presented.
*802Plaintiff on or about September 1, 1917, paid defendant some $10,500, for which the defendant delivered its draft for 50,000 Russian rubles on a bank in Moscow. On or about November 5, 1917, the plaintiff, learning that the draft had not been paid in Moscow (for reasons which are not adverted to by either party and may, therefore, be disregarded), made the following arrangement with the defendant: That the latter should…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Terry v. . MungerNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Schenck v. . State Line Telephone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1924
- Gravenhorst v. . ZimmermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Hennessy v. BaconSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Taylor v. . GoeletNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- North American Graphite Corp. v. AllanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
- Parker v. HoppeNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Lumber Mutual Casualty Insurance v. FriedmanNew York Supreme Court · 1941
- Schochet v. Public National BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
- 524 West End Ave., Inc. v. RawakAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1925
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.