Wilson v. Viking Corp.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Stadtfeld, J.,
This suit was originally begun by a foreign attachment. The defendant entered its appearance and filed its bond to dissolve the attachment, and the suit continued as in assumpsit. The suit was to recover the sum of $1585 upon a written contract with, the defendant, made by its vice-president, A. E. Johnson, on November 3,1934. At the first trial held on November 25, 1935, a non-suit was entered against the plaintiff on the ground that Mr. Johnson’s authority to enter into the contract for the defendant was not shown. On a motion to take off the non-suit, the court made…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Howell Et Ux. v. WheelockSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Bayne v. Proctor & Gamble Distributing Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Parker v. Oil Well Supply Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
3Cited by15 opinions
- United Refining Co. v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- International Milling Co. v. Hachmeister, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Shehadi v. Northeastern Nat. Bank of Pa.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Neville v. ScottSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co. v. ZieglerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.