Legal Opinion
Neville v. Scott
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided December 28, 1956No. Appeal, 179PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Wright, J.,
On November 17, 1950, Wilkins M. and Frances M. Neville, husband and wife, instituted an action in assumpsit against Bart J. Scott to recover damages for breach of contract. The jury found for the plaintiffs in the sum of $2,761.00. Defendant filed motions for judgment n.o.v: and for a new trial. The court en banc overruled both motions, but conditioned its refusal of a new trial upon the filing of a stipulation by plaintiffs remitting $761.00 of the verdict. Judgment was accordingly entered in the sum of $2,000.00, and this appeal by defendant followed.
On October 18,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gianni v. Russell Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- International Milling Co. v. Hachmeister, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Landreth v. First Nat. Bk. of Phila.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Wilson v. Viking Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Lamb v. Allegheny County Institution DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
3Cited by38 opinions
- Southwestern Energy Production Co. v. Forest Resources, LLCSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Kroblin Refrigerated Xpress, Inc. v. PitterichCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Rocks v. BrosiusCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
- Giant Food Stores, LLC v. THF Silver Spring Development, LPSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- United Refining Co. v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.