Parker v. Oil Well Supply Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 69, Oct. T., 1897, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. No. 2, Allegheny County, Oct. T., 1895, No. 501, on verdict for plaintiffs. Assumpsit for breach of contract. The .facts appear by the opinion of the Supreme Court.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 69, Oct. T., 1897, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. No. 2, Allegheny County, Oct. T., 1895, No. 501, on verdict for plaintiffs. Assumpsit for breach of contract. The .facts appear by the opinion of the Supreme Court. Defendant’s points and the answers thereto among others were as follows: 1. Under the evidence in this case, the jury should not find that the defendant is guilty of any breach of its undertaking to become or furnish bondsmen, or become guarantor for bondsmen in the attachment cases against the plaintiffs, and they should exclude from their verdict all damages…
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice McCollum,
There are twenty-three assignments of error filed in this case. Fifteen of them are based on answers to the defendant’s points, three on the admission of evidence objected to by the defendant, three on excerpts from the charge, and two on the alleged inadequacy, partiality and misleading tendencies of the charge as a whole. The questions raised by them are not so numerous. As preliminary to the consideration of the questions to be determined it should be stated that previous to and at the time of the transaction which resulted in this litigation the plaintiffs…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Colozzi v. Bevko, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
- Rekas v. DopkavichSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Wilson v. Viking Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Fleisher Engineering & Construction Co. v. Winston Bros.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950