Legal Opinion

Commercial Credit Co. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 16, 1930No. 5970Published

1Per curiam

A federal prohibition agent, having discovered a person in the act of transporting intoxicating liquor in an automobile, in violation of the National Prohibition Act (27 *992USCA) seized the automobile and arrested the driver. Later, the driver was prosecuted under the revenue laws, and a judgment was entered, in a separate proceeding, forfeiting the automobile under section 3450 of the Revised Statutes (26 USCA § 1181), as in Davies Motors, Inc., v. United States (C. C. A.) 35 F.(2d) 928. From the judgment of forfeiture, the present appeal is prosecuted.

The judgment is reversed on the authority…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Richbourg Motor Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Davies Motors, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API