Legal Opinion

United States v. One Buick Automobile

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided March 25, 1930No. 1213PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUTCHESON, District Judge.

In this case one J. A. Roberts, having used a parked Buick eoupé as a place in which to store and from which to sell whisky, was tried and convicted for possession and sale of intoxicating liquor. The ear, having been seized by the officers, was libelled under section 3450, Rev. St. (26 USCA § 1181).

The Brazos Valley Buick Company and Bob Sullivan, the one holding a mortgage and the other being an indorser on the notes secured by the car, intervened, pleading and proving innocence and want of complicity in the unlawful act, or any guilty knowledge.

The bottles…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. One Ford Coupe AutomobileSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Port Gardner Investment Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Commercial Credit Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  4. Commercial Credit Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
  5. General Motors Acceptance Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Automobile Financing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1938
  2. United States v. One Fargo TruckDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1930
  3. United States v. One Ford Panel TruckDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API