State v. Perkins

*163The opinion of tine court was delivered by

Moritz, J.:

We granted Thomas Perkins’ petition for review of the Court of Appeals’ decision affirming his conviction for driving under tire influence of alcohol (DUI). Perkins claims he was deprived of his right to a unanimous jury verdict because the State charged him with alternative means of committing DUI, the jury was instructed on both means, and the State failed to present sufficient evidence to establish both means on which tire jury was instructed.

Relying on State v. Ahrens, 296 Kan. 151, 290 P.3d 629 (2012), we reverse the Court of Appeals’…