Legal Opinion

Friedberg v. Betts

District Court, D. Hawaii

Decided June 30, 2023No. 1:21-cv-00068Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF HAWAII DR. ALYSSA FRIEDBERG AND PAUL CIV. NO. 21-00068 LEK-KJM SHINDELL, Plaintiffs, vs. CATHY BETTS, ELLADINE OLEVAO, KINTARO YONEKURA, IWALANI KAAUWAI-HERROD, KIRSTIE KASHIMA, HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, STACIE PASCUAL, JAMES WALTHER, AND RYAN AKAMINE, Defendants. ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF ECF 229 AND DECLINING TO EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION OVER PLAINTIFFS’ REMAINING STATE LAW CLAIMS On November 28, 2022, the Order Granting Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment was issued…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Carlsbad Technology, Inc. v. HIF Bio, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. George Acri v. Varian Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  4. Coleman v. TollefsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  5. School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation E.J. Bartells Company, a Washington Corporation A.P. Green Refractories Company, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation, and Fibreboard Corp., a Delaware Corporation as Successor in Interest to the Paraffine Companies, Inc., Pabco Products, Inc., Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation, Plant Rubber & Asbestos Works and Plant Rubber & Asbestos Co., School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Keene Corporation, a New York Corporation Individually and as Successor in Interest to the Baldwin Ehret Hill Company, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Us Gypsum Company, a Delaware Corporation, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corporation, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Flintkote Company, a Delaware Corporation, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API