Legal Opinion
George Acri v. Varian Associates, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 12, 1997No. 95-16666PublishedCited by 1,155 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge RYMER; Dissent by Judge O’SCANNLAIN.
RYMER, Circuit Judge:
George Acri sued his former employer, Varían Associates, Inc., in California Superi- or Court, alleging age discrimination claims under both federal and California law, as well as contract claims under California law. The parties are non-diverse, but Varían removed the action to federal court on the basis of Acri’s claim under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. The district court granted summary judgment on the supplemental state law claims as well as the federal age discrimination claim.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Rosado v. WymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Rodriguez-Bruno v. Doral MortgageCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Schneider v. TRW, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1,155 opinions
- Rafael Arroyo, Jr. v. Carmen RosasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Robert Reese, Jr. v. County of SacramentoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 291, 98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 398 Government Employees Insurance Company v. Alexander Dizol, Special Administrator of the Estate of Kevin Tate Dizol, DeceasedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- In Re Digimarc Corp. Derivative LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Sweaney v. Ada CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
1,150 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.