Legal Opinion
Franklin Sugar Refining Co. v. Egerton
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided April 7, 1923No. 2015PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOODS, Circuit Judge.
The Franklin Sugar Refining Company seeks to recover damages for breach of alleged contracts for the purchase of sugar embraced in this table:
No. of Contract.
Date Made, 1920.
Barrels.
For Delivery in Month of
4239 (1/2) June 23 ' 115 July
156 May 27 500’ July
4340 June 29 244 August
162 May 27 500 August
2142 June 5 280 September
4868 July 7 150 September 5437 July 13 300 September
5857 July 20 300 October
The District Judge in his instructions distinguished the alleged sales as presenting several different questions of law and fact. There were numerous requests to charge, only one…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ryan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Pressed Steel Car Co. v. Eastern Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
- Barry v. CoombeSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
- Franklin Sugar Refining Co. v. HowellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Drury v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1882
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Franklin Sugar Refining Co. v. JohnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Milliken-Tomlinson Co. v. American Sugar Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1925
- Connecticut Fire Ins. Co. v. Davison Chemical Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1944
- Territory of Hawaii v. BrancoHawaii Supreme Court · 1958
- Howell v. Witman-Schwartz Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1925
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.