Howell v. Witman-Schwartz Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIS, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiffs, at the time of the transaction which resulted in this litigation, were sugar brokers doing business in the city of New York, and the defendant was a wholesale grocer engaged in business at Harrisburg, Pa. The plaintiffs, on or about July 9, 1920, sold defendant 360 bags and 200 cases of line granulated sugar. The price fell, and the defendant refused to accept the sugar. Plaintiffs, on account of diversity of citizenship, brought suit in the District Court for breach of contract, and claimed as damages the difference between the contract price and the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Beckwith v. TalbotSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Ryan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Snare & Triest Co. v. FriedmanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1909
- Franklin Sugar Refining Co. v. HowellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Title Guaranty & Surety Co. v. LippincottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re Flying W Airways, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
- Smith v. Onyx Oil & Chemical Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1954
- Pfeifer v. WrightCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930
- Pfeifer v. WrightCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930