Franklin Sugar Refining Co. v. John
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Sadler,
The firm of John & Bros, conducts a grocery business, and purchased needed sugar at various times from the plaintiff. Its practice in buying was to apply to the *107J. H. Huston Co., a representative of the Refining Company, which here sues, and the former, as selling agent of the latter, had the orders forwarded, accepted, and filled. In three instances, between July 1 and July 15, 1920, — there being at the time difficulty in securing an adequate supply, — the broker made reservations of a number of barrels for subsequent delivery to the defendant. The allotments…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Wilson v. . Lewiston Mill Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Franklin Sugar Refining Co. v. HowellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Manufacturers Light & Heat Co. v. LampSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Title Guaranty & Surety Co. v. LippincottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
- Soles v. HickmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1853
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Target Sportswear, Inc. v. Clearfield FoundationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Vitro Manufacturing Co. v. Standard Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Rothenberg v. H. Rothstein & SonsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
- Birdzell v. Utah Oil Refining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1952
- Brister & Koester Lumber Corp. v. American Lumber Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.