Legal Opinion

Connecticut Fire Ins. Co. v. Davison Chemical Corp.

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided February 15, 1944No. 2648PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHESNUT, District Judge.

The only new point in this case is the proper meaning of the phrase “a pro rata monthly premium” as it appears in the “continuation clause” of the American Institute Time Hull Form of Marine Insurance Policy. The whole clause reads as follows:

“Provided, however, should the Vessel at the expiration of this Policy be at sea, or in distress, or at a port of refuge or call, she shall, provided previous notice be given to the Underwriters, be held covered at a pro rata monthly premium to her port of destination.”

The particular marine policy was issued by the Connecticut…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Eagle Star & British Dominions v. TadlockDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1938
  2. Federal Intermediate Credit Bank v. Globe & Rutgers Fire Ins.District Court, D. Maryland · 1934
  3. Franklin Sugar Refining Co. v. EgertonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1923
  4. Western Petroleum Co. v. Tidal Gasoline Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1922

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Lien Ho Hsing Steel Enterprise Co. v. WeihtagCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  2. Gelb v. Automobile Ins. Co. of HartfordCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
  3. Whiteman v. Rhode Island Ins. Co.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1948
  4. Hauser v. AMERICAN CENTRAL INSURANCE CO., ST. LOUIS, MO.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1963
  5. Illinois Constructors Corp. v. Morency & Associates, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API