Legal Opinion
Muckleshoot Tribe v. Lummi Indian Tribe
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 17, 1998No. Nos. 96-35341, 96-35342PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHWARZER, Senior District Judge:
This appeal brings before us two disputes, (1) between the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe (“Muckleshoot”) and the Swinomish Indian Tribal Community (“Swinomish”) and (2) between the Muckleshoot and the Lummi Indian Nation (“Lummi”), over the interpretation of a decree adjudicating Indian treaty fishing rights in Washington state in respect to salmon and defining the “usual and accustomed fishing places” of the parties to this appeal in respect thereto. United States v. Washington, 384 F.Supp. 312, 360 (W.D.Wash.1974) (Boldt, J.) [hereinafter “Decision /”]; United…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. WashingtonDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1974
- Covey v. Hollydale Mobilehome EstatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Edwin R. O'Neill v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. WashingtonDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1978
- United States v. Eldon Guy Trenary, United States of America v. John Clyde AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Does I thru XXIII v. Advanced Textile Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Gilbrook v. City of WestminsterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Lummi Indian TribeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Lummi Indian TribeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Ruiz v. Snohomish County Public Utility District No. 1Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.