Legal Opinion
United States v. Lummi Indian Tribe
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 13, 2000No. 98-35964PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BEEZER, Circuit Judge:
The Lummi Indian Tribe appeals from the final judgment entered in favor of the Lower Elwha Band of S’Klallams, the Jamestown Band of S’Klallams, the Port Gamble Band of S’Klallams and the Sko-komish Indian Tribe (collectively “the Four Tribes”). The district court concluded that Judge Boldt, in United States v. Washington, 384 F.Supp. 312, 332 (W.D.Wash.1974) (Boldt, J.) (hereinafter “Decision”), aff'd, 520 F.2d 676 (9th Cir.1975), did not intend for the Lummi’s usual and accustomed fishing grounds and stations to include the Strait of Juan de Fuca, Admiralty Inlet or…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Bankers Trust Co. v. MallisSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Balint v. Carson CityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Milgard Tempering, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Selas Corporation of America, a Foreign Corporation, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. WashingtonDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1974
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Shannon Casey v. Albertson's Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Lummi Indian TribeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Negron-Almeda v. SantiagoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
- Catherine Ingle v. Circuit City, a Virginia CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Harold Hall v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.