Legal Opinion

Covey v. Hollydale Mobilehome Estates

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 18, 1997No. 96-55056PublishedCited by 156 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:

Anthony Covey, Caren Covey, Anthony Pegnatori, and Karen Pegnatori (“Appellants”) lived in a mobile home park where children were unwelcome. They sued Holly-dale Mobile Home Estates (“the Park”) and its owners, trustees and employees (collectively, “Appellees”), claiming that Appellees discriminated against them on the basis of familial status, in violation of the Fair Housing Act (“FHA”), because they had children living in their mobilehomes. During the pen-dency of Appellants’ action, the Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) changed the regulations…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Bowen v. Georgetown University HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Bradley v. School Bd. of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Thorpe v. Housing Authority of DurhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. v. BonjornoSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by156 opinions

  1. Frost v. AgnosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  2. Tworivers v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  3. Davis v. Team Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  4. Balint v. Carson CityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  5. Galt G/S v. JSS ScandinaviaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998

151 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API