Brandon v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
HACKETT, District Judge.
This matter is presently before the court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment pursuant to F.R.Civ.P. 56. Defendant alleges that its denial of plaintiff’s extended disability benefits (EDB) was not arbitrary and capricious. Oral argument was heard on this motion on January 6, 1988, at 2:00 p.m.
Standard for Summary Judgment
F.R.Civ.P. 56(c) provides that a moving party is entitled to summary judgment “if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file,…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- William Butler Smith v. Leman HudsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Spray v. Unum Life Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1989
- Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2002