Legal Opinion

Commercial Banking Corp. v. Martel

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 22, 1942PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MANDELBAUM, District Judge.

Plaintiff, a foreign corporation, obtained a judgment against the defendant after trial. On appeal, this judgment was reversed and a new trial ordered. The order on mandate fixed the defendant’s costs at $524.15 which were duly taxed and a judgment entered therefor.

The defendant now seeks a stay of the trial for a period of sixty (60) days after the payment by the plaintiff to it of the said judgment for costs.

There appears to be no provision in the United States Code Annotated or in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following Section 723c, for a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cloquet Lumber Co. v. BurnsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915
  2. Sheehan v. CoffeyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
  3. Land Oberoesterreich v. GudeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1937

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hartford Textile Corporation v. Hartford Textile CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  2. Gaussen v. United Fruit Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1970
  3. Shuffman v. Hartford Textile Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API