Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Stewart

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 11, 2003No. SCBD 4745PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHodges, J.

¶ 1 The issues before this Court are: (1) Whether the record before this Court is sufficient for this Court’s review of the charges against the respondent and for disposition, and (2) What is the appropriate discipline. We find that the record is sufficient for a meaningful review and that the appropriate discipline is a four-year suspension.

¶ 2 This disciplinary proceeding is before this Court under rule 7 of the Rules Governing Disciplinary Proceedings (RGDP), Okla. Stat. tit. 5, ch.l, app. 1-A (2001). The respondent, Jami Lynn Stewart, was convicted of a crime in the United States District…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. ToddSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  2. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. PattersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  3. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. LivsheeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  4. State ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. PattersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  5. STATE, EX REL. OKLAHOMA BAR ASS'N v. BadgerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. MothershedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
  2. STATE EX REL. OKLAHOMA BAR ASS'N v. ConradySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2012
  3. STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. MANSFIELDSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015
  4. State ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. McArthurSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013
  5. STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. WINTORYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API