Legal Opinion

Keller v. Kinsley

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 26, 1992No. 1726PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DEL SOLE, Judge:

This is an appeal from an order denying Appellant’s request for permission to proceed in forma pauperis. After a jury trial, Appellant was convicted of involuntary deviate sexual intercourse, unlawful restraint, and indecent assault and was sentenced to serve a term of not less than six and one-half years nor more than twenty years at the State Correctional Institution in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Following his conviction, Appellant filed a Petition to proceed in forma pauperis, in a civil proceeding, which was denied based upon the trial court’s conclusion that the claims…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bell v. Beneficial Consumer Discount Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. T. C. R. Realty, Inc. v. CoxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Motheral v. BurkhartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Guarrasi v. ScottCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. McGriff v. VidovichCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Bell v. Mayview State HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  4. Ocasio v. Prison Health ServicesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  5. Bailey v. WakefieldCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API