Legal Opinion

Ipock v. . Gaskins

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 2, 1913PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This proceeding was brought for the purpose of processioning the lands of the parties, who are adjoining proprietors, and of ascertaining and declaring where is the dividing line between them. The case, in one view of it, turns upon the true location of the line which is first called for in the deeds, under which the plaintiff claims as color of title. The plaintiff introduced and read in evidence a grant from the State to Samuel Lawson for 200 acres of land, and offered evidence to prove that it covered the land in controversy, but there was no evidence connecting his deeds with this grant,…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Triplett v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  2. Gudger v. White.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  3. Moffitt v. . ManessSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  4. Blake v. DohertySupreme Court of the United States · 1820
  5. Kea v. . RobesonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1848

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Moore v. WhitleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  2. Medina v. Town and Country Ford, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  3. Shephard v. . HortonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  4. Atlantic Greyhound Corp. v. SmithdealCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1951
  5. Mitchell v. . HeckstallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API