Legal Opinion

Moore v. Whitley

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 19, 1951No. 23PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiNborNe, J.

The sole assignment of error presented for consideration on this appeal challenges the ruling of the court below in bolding that the Moores, plaintiffs, are entitled to a jury trial. Testing their exceptions to the referee’s report, and their tender of issues, particularly the issue of title arising on the pleadings, by rules of procedure for preserving right to jury trial in a compulsory reference case, as enunciated in decisions of this Court, it appears that they meet the requirement sufficiently to withstand successful attack. See Booker v. Highlands, 198 N.C. 282, 151 S.E. 635; Brown v.…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Gudger v. White.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  2. Brown v. HodgesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  3. Seawell v. . HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  4. Booker v. Town of HighlandsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  5. Brown v. E. H. Clement Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Gwathmey v. STATE THROUGH DEPT. OF ENVIR.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
  2. Cutts v. CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. RESORT DEVELOPMENT CO. v. PhillipsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. Solon Lodge No. 9 Knights of Pythias Co. v. Ionic Lodge Free Ancient & Accepted Masons No. 72 Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  5. Miller v. MillerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API