Legal Opinion

Shephard v. . Horton

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 19, 1924PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

That the estate conveyed by the deed is a fee simple under the rule in Shelley’s case, as the plaintiff contends, is a proposition which in our opinion cannot be maintained. This is evident from the language of the rule itself: “Where a person takes an estate of freehold, legally or equitably, under a deed or will, or other writing, and in the same instrument there is a limitation by way of remainder, either with or without the interposition of another estate, of any interest of the same legal or equitable quality to his heirs, or heirs of his body, as a class of persons to take in succession…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Triplett v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  2. Reid v. . NealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  3. Willis v. Mutual Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  4. Hampton v. GriggsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  5. Seawell v. . HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Oxendine v. LewisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  2. Lee v. BarefootSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  3. Lee v. . BarefootSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  4. Daniel v. . BassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  5. McNeill v. . BlevinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API