Legal Opinion

Ottens v. Atlas Assurance Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1938PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed November 9, 1937:

Wickhem, J.

The first question upon this appeal (and in view of the court’s conclusions the only one that need be dealt with in this opinion) is, May a party to a standard fire insurance policy issued in complete conformity to statutory requirements have this policy reformed by the substitution of provisions inconsistent with its standard provisions ? The court is of the view that this question must receive a negative answer. In Bourgeois v. Northwestern National Ins. Co. 86 Wis. 606, 610, 57 N. W. 347, this court said, referring to the standard…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bourgeois v. Northwestern National InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Temple v. Niagara Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Williams v. Travelers Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Schilbrch v. Inter-Ocean Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Fountain v. Importers & Exporters InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Olander v. KlapproteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Progressive Mutual Insurance v. TaylorMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. Harold A. Miller v. National Farmers Union Property And Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
  4. Miller v. National Farmers Union PropertyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972
  5. Schafer v. Shelby Farmers Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API