Ottens v. Atlas Assurance Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
The following opinion was filed November 9, 1937:
Wickhem, J.
The first question upon this appeal (and in view of the court’s conclusions the only one that need be dealt with in this opinion) is, May a party to a standard fire insurance policy issued in complete conformity to statutory requirements have this policy reformed by the substitution of provisions inconsistent with its standard provisions ? The court is of the view that this question must receive a negative answer. In Bourgeois v. Northwestern National Ins. Co. 86 Wis. 606, 610, 57 N. W. 347, this court said, referring to the standard…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bourgeois v. Northwestern National InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
- Temple v. Niagara Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
- Williams v. Travelers Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1919
- Schilbrch v. Inter-Ocean Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
- Fountain v. Importers & Exporters InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Olander v. KlapproteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
- Progressive Mutual Insurance v. TaylorMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
- Harold A. Miller v. National Farmers Union Property And Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
- Miller v. National Farmers Union PropertyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972
- Schafer v. Shelby Farmers Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1945