Legal Opinion
Miller v. National Farmers Union Property
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided December 6, 1972No. 72-1046PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LAY, Circuit Judge.
In an action for a declaratory judgment the district court was faced, as we are on appeal, with the repetitive task of untangling another web of confusion created by the inarticulate language of two automobile liability policies.1 At stake is the respective obligations of each company, the personal liability of their insured and their financial responsibility to injured parties. The district court, 334 F.Supp. 557, found that State Automobile and Casualty Underwriters (hereinafter State Auto) provided the sole protection to its insured, Harold A. Miller, for a truck-car…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Bobich v. OjaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- American Fidelity & Casualty Company, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Threshermen & Farmers' Mutual Casualty Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
- Allstate Insurance Co. v. Shelby Mutual Ins. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Woodrich Construction Co. v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Continental Cas. Co. v. WeekesSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Transport Indemnity Company, a California Corporation v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, a Massachusetts CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Harold A. Miller v. National Farmers Union Property And Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
- Fisher v. TylerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
- Cage v. Litchfield Mutual InsuranceConnecticut Superior Court · 1997
- Leppla v. American Family Insurance GroupSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.