Legal Opinion
United States v. Grinnell Corporation
District Court, D. Rhode Island
Decided November 27, 1964No. Civ. A. 2785PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WYZANSKI, District Judge.
There follow in order an introduction,, findings of fact, conclusions of law, opinion on liability, and opinion on remedy.
A. INTRODUCTION
This is a civil suit wherein the Government complains that Sections 1 and 2 of' the Sherman Act [Act of July 2, 1890, c.. 647, 26 Stat. 209, 50 Stat. 693, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1, 2] have been violated by Grinnell Corporation, a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in Providence, Rhode Island, (hereafter called “Grinnell”), and three corporations, a majority of the capital stock of each of which is owned by Grinnell, to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Nash v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Schwegmann Bros. v. Calvert Distillers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- United States v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1953
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- City of Detroit v. Grinnell Corporation, Manhattan-Ward, Incorporated v. Grinnell Corporation, 1225 Vine Street Building, Inc. v. Grinnell CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Berkey Photo, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. Eastman Kodak Company, Defendant-Appellant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- City of Detroit v. Grinnell Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- George R. Whitten, Jr., Inc., D/B/A Whitten Corporation v. Paddock Pool Builders, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1974
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.