Commonwealth v. Hendricks
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Per curiam
This appeal is from the judgment of sentence for robbery, 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 3701. Appellant contends that the trial court erred in refusing to rule on his submitted points for charge before the start of closing arguments, as required by Pa.R.Crim.P. 1119(a). For the reasons set forth below, we vacate the judgment of sentence and remand for a new trial.1
*383On May 24, 1984, appellant was arrested and charged with robbery and related offenses. Following a jury trial, on August 23, 1985, appellant was found guilty of robbery and acquitted of all other charges. Timely post-trial motions were filed and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. WanderCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Frank T. McCown United States of America v. Gary Lee Barnes, United States of America v. Gary Leslie BarnesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Ross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1950
- Cambanis v. Nationwide InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Burns v. Pepsi-Cola Metropolitan Bottling Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MelvinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Sutch, R. v. Roxborough Memorial HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Commonwealth v. AlstonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- State of Idaho v. Michael Joseph AmeliaIdaho Court of Appeals · 2007
- Com. v. Demmitt, H.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.