Legal Opinion

United States v. Wander

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 27, 1979No. Nos. 78-1983, 78-1984, 79-1201 and 79-1202PublishedCited by 104 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ROSENN, Circuit Judge.

Co-defendants David Wander and Edward Reddington appeal from their convictions of conspiracy in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 (1976), and on three counts of violating the Travel Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1952 (1976). Of the issues raised on this appeal, we are persuaded by the defendants’ contentions that the indictments on the Travel Act counts are defective and that the district court erred by amending the jury instructions. We therefore reverse the convictions, dismiss the indictments on the Travel Act counts, and remand the case for a new trial on the…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  4. Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. United States v. BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1896

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by104 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MelvinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. United States v. Leonard A. PelulloCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  3. United States v. Willie George ChildressCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
  4. United States v. J. Murray Hooker, IICourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
  5. United States v. John M. Arruda, United States of America v. Edward RinglandCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983

99 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API