Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Alston

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 11, 2000No. 1082 EDA 1999PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECK, J.:

¶ 1 This case raises the novel question of whether a violation of Pennsylvania Rule of Criminal Procedure 1119, titled Request for Instructions, Charge to the Jury, and Preliminary Instructions, is sufficient to warrant a new trial or whether a defendant must establish prejudice as a result of the violation. After careful consideration of the applicable law, we hold that in order to prevail on a Rule 1119 claim, a party must prove prejudice. Hence, we affirm the judgment of sentence.

¶ 2 The evidence at trial, when viewed as it must be in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. United States v. WanderCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
  3. United States v. Frank T. McCown United States of America v. Gary Lee Barnes, United States of America v. Gary Leslie BarnesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  4. Commonwealth v. NievesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Commonwealth v. HendricksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MelvinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Com. v. James, G.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
  3. Com. v. James, G.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
  4. Com. v. Ibrahim, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  5. Com. v. Orie Melvin, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API