Commonwealth v. Alston
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
BECK, J.:
¶ 1 This case raises the novel question of whether a violation of Pennsylvania Rule of Criminal Procedure 1119, titled Request for Instructions, Charge to the Jury, and Preliminary Instructions, is sufficient to warrant a new trial or whether a defendant must establish prejudice as a result of the violation. After careful consideration of the applicable law, we hold that in order to prevail on a Rule 1119 claim, a party must prove prejudice. Hence, we affirm the judgment of sentence.
¶ 2 The evidence at trial, when viewed as it must be in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. WanderCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Frank T. McCown United States of America v. Gary Lee Barnes, United States of America v. Gary Leslie BarnesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Commonwealth v. NievesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Commonwealth v. HendricksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MelvinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Com. v. James, G.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
- Com. v. James, G.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
- Com. v. Ibrahim, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Com. v. Orie Melvin, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.