Legal Opinion
Inmar Associates, Inc. v. Borough of Carlstadt
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided December 10, 1986PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
214 N.J. Super. 256 (1986)
518 A.2d 1110
INMAR ASSOCIATES, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
BOROUGH OF CARLSTADT, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
GAF CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
BOROUGH OF SOUTH BOUND BROOK, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued September 8, 1986.
Decided December 10, 1986.
Before Judges J.H. COLEMAN, R.S. COHEN and GRUCCIO.
Edward J. Egan, attorney for appellant Inmar Associates, Inc. (Edward J. Egan and William J. Gianos, on the brief).
Langan and Lynch, attorneys for respondent Borough of Carlstadt (John J. Langan, Jr., on the letter brief).
Steven…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- State, Dept. of Environ. Protect. v. Ventron Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
- Ohio v. KovacsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Aetna Life Insurance Co. v. City of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Switz v. Township of MiddletownSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
- Rek Investment Co. v. City of NewarkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Inmar Associates, Inc. v. Borough of CarlstadtSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- T & E IND. v. Safety Light Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
- In Re Appeal of Camel City Laundry Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
- City of Newark v. BLOCK 1183New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
- Russo v. Borough of CarlstadtNew Jersey Tax Court · 1997