Legal Opinion
Inmar Associates, Inc. v. Borough of Carlstadt
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided October 13, 1988PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
O’HERN, J.
This appeal concerns the proper method for determining the assessed value of real property subject to governmentally-imposed requirements for environmental cleanup. We agree with the courts below that neither case presented an adequate basis under proper appraisal techniques for reaching the correct value by the simple expedient of deducting the estimated cost of such cleanups from the municipality’s assessed valuation of the lands. We find, however, that the proofs in the Inmar case raised a sufficient challenge to the correctness of the…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Midlantic National Bank v. New Jersey Department of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- State, Dept. of Environ. Protect. v. Ventron Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
- Ohio v. KovacsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Ayers v. Township of JacksonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
- F.M.C. Stores Co. v. Borough of Morris PlainsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Allied Corp. v. Town of CamillusNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Ford Motor Co. v. Township of EdisonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
- Commerce Holding Corp. v. Board of AssessorsNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Housing Authority v. Suydam Investors, LLCSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2003
- In Re: Custom Distribution Services Inc., Debtor City of Perth Amboy v. Custom Distribution Services, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.