Legal Opinion

Schultz v. Ohio Bureau of Workers' Compensation

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 9, 2002No. Case No. 01CA2809PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kline, Judge.

{¶ 1} The Industrial Commission of Ohio determined that Elizabeth B. Schultz committed fraud in her receipt of workers’ compensation benefits. Schultz filed a complaint seeking a jury determination of fraud in the Scioto County Court of Common Pleas. The court dismissed her complaint based upon lack of subject-matter jurisdiction pursuant to R.C. 4123.512. Schultz appeals, asserting that the issue of whether she committed fraud in the receipt of her workers’ compensation benefits is not an “extent of disability” issue and, therefore, the trial court possessed jurisdiction to…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Preston v. MurtyOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  2. May v. Tandy Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Afrates v. City of LorainOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Kneisley v. Lattimer-Stevens Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Felty v. AT&T Technologies, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gomez v. Sauder Woodworking Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Wean v. Mabe, 2006-T-0064 (4-16-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API