Legal Opinion

UNIVERSAL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY v. Peterson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 5, 1968No. 40618PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peterson, Justice.

Defendant appeals from the denial of his post-trial motion for amended findings or, in the alternative, for a new trial in a mechanics lien foreclosure action. We affirm the trial court on all issues presented but discuss only the principal issue raised: Whether in the particular circumstance of this case plaintiff’s mechanics lien was enforceable notwithstanding the fact that the complaint was not actually filed with the clerk of court before the summons was served as required by the mechanics lien statute.

Plaintiff, having claims against defendant arising out of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Baskerville v. BaskervilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  2. Carr-Cullen Co. v. CooperSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  3. State v. ParkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  4. Melvey v. BowmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  5. Miles Construction Co. v. KrumreySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Parker v. O'PHELANCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  2. Blohm v. Minneapolis Urological Surgeons, P.A.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
  3. Blohm v. Minneapolis Urological Surgeons, P.A.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API