Legal Opinion
Blohm v. Minneapolis Urological Surgeons, P.A.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided August 15, 1989No. C6-88-2515Published
1Opinion of the Court
442 N.W.2d 812 (1989)
Roger D. BLOHM, et al., Respondents,
v.
MINNEAPOLIS UROLOGICAL SURGEONS, P.A., et al., Respondents,
Metropolitan Internists, P.A., et al., Petitioners.
No. C6-88-2515.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota.
July 3, 1989.
Review Granted August 15, 1989.
Reed K. Mackenzie, Mackenzie & Hallberg, P.A., Minneapolis, for Blohm.
Donna J. Blazevic, Bassford, Heckt, et al., Minneapolis, for Minneapolis Urological Surgeons, P.A.
Robert E. Salmon, Meagher, Geer, Markham, et al., Minneapolis, for Metropolitan Internists, P.A.
Kathryn Helen Davis, Minneapolis, amicus Minnesota Defense Lawyers' Ass'n.
John…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Wenninger v. MuesingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Minneapolis Star & Tribune Co. v. SchumacherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Marriage of Tischendorf v. TischendorfSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Richardson v. School Board of Independent School District No. 271Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Parker v. O'PHELANCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.