Legal Opinion
Southern California Gas Co. v. Flannery
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 16, 2014No. B249616PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KRIEGLER, J.
Plaintiff and respondent Southern California Gas Company (SCGC) filed a complaint in interpleader against defendant and appellant Patrick Flannery and his former attorney. SCGC filed a motion for discharge from the interpleader action and an award of attorney fees under Code of Civil Procedure section 386.6 1 (the Discharge Motion) and Flannery filed a special motion to strike under section 425.16 (the Anti-SLAPP Motion). The court granted the Discharge Motion and denied the Anti-SLAPP Motion. Flannery appeals both orders.
Flannery contends the court erroneously concluded…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Navellier v. SlettenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
- Oasis West Realty v. GoldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- PLCM Group, Inc. v. DrexlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Southern California Gas Co. v. FlanneryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Barrett Daffin Frappier Treder & Weiss, LLP v. Garau CA2/1California Court of Appeal · 2020
- Hood v. GonzalesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
- Southern California Gas Co. v. FlanneryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Yahoo! Inc. v. Media Relevance, Inc. CA6California Court of Appeal · 2016