Legal Opinion
Feeley v. Whitman Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 1, 1999No. 90 Civ. 2815(JES)PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SPRIZZO, District Judge.
Plaintiff Eugene Feeley, individually and as assignee of the Peekskill Muffler Corporation (“PMC”) (collectively “plaintiff’) brings the instant action for damages against The Whitman Corporation, Midas International Corporation, Midas Realty Corporation, and Cosmic Enterprises, Inc. (collectively “Midas”), alleging claims under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. § 1961, et seq., and claims for fraud and tortious interference with contract and prospective economic advantage under the common law of the…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Rodriguez v. Almighty Cleaning, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2011
- Odyssey Re (London) Ltd. v. Stirling Cooke Brown Holdings Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Citadel Management, Inc. v. Telesis Trust, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- O'Callaghan v. SifreDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Cablevision of Southern Connecticut, Ltd. Partnership v. SmithDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.